Deep Throat Part II

D-Tesh👑 2023-08-05

Daffy nurse Linda Lovelace (an appealing portrayal by the extremely cute Linda Lovelace) works for libidinous goofball sex therapist Dr. Jayson (broadly played with delicious eye-rolling gusto by Harry Reems). One of the patients she is treating is Dilbert Lamb (an engagingly nerdy turn by Richard Livermore), a meek geek who's harboring the plans for a top secret government computer. Both the KGB and CIA alike attempt to enlist Lovelace in order to obtain the data on the computer. Noted soft-core writer/director Joe Sarno is in an atypically playful and lighthearted mood here: he relates the hilariously ridiculous plot at a constant swift pace, nicely mines an amusing line in amiably silly humor, maintains a breezy tone throughout, and really pulls out the stops with the off-the-wall slapstick conclusion. A prime cast of familiar East Coast hardcore cinema veterans have themselves a field day with the cheerfully inane material: Jamie Gillis, Marc Stevens, and Tanya Tickler as bumbling CIA agents, David Davidson as the handsome and mysterious Ken Whacker, Helen Madigan as the ditsy Bonnie Smiley, the ever-adorable Chris Jordan as seductive Russian agent Sonya Toroscova, and Tina Russell as lascivious old bag Aunt Juliet. Look fast for stand-up comedienne Judy Tenuta and the legendary Georgina Spelvin in bit roles. The groovy score by Lou Argese and Tony Bruno hits the get-down funky spot and keeps things bubbling along. George Quinn's lively cinematography boasts lots of snapp

lovine 2023-08-05

Deep Throat Part II (1974) BOMB (out of 4) Nurse Lovelace (Linda of course) and Dr. Jayson (Harry Reems) get involved in a government conspiracy as they try to bring down a man known as Dilbert Lamb. It turns out Lamb is harboring a secret government computer so Lovelace must use her magic to try and help. DEEP THROAT broke into the mainstream and became a huge success even though it was a hardcore * film. There's no question that it was a major game changer so obviously a sequel would be a no-brainer. Joseph W. Sarno's DEEP THROAT PART II is pure exploitation at its very worse. The film is basically a R-rated attempt to try and cash in on the success of the first film. There were rumors for years that it was shot as a hardcore picture but these sequences were stolen by the Mafia. There are rumors that it was meant to be shot softcore because Lovelace refused the sex. There are all sorts of rumors out there about the film but as it stands this is basically just a screwball comedy with nothing going for it. When I say nothing I really do mean nothing because there's really not much sex, there's no laughs and the entire thing is just very annoying. Even if they didn't advertise this as a sequel to the hardcore legend the film still wouldn't work. The entire story is just downright dumb and doesn't make for any entertainment. Even worse is that the comedy is so bad that you just find yourself sinking into your seat. Even worse is the fact that Reems, Lovelace and even Jamie Gill

Sabry ✌️Douxmiel❤️☺️🍯 2023-08-05

As a fan of the Golden Age of Adult film, I found "Deep Throat II" to be thoroughly enjoyable. How great it is to see familiar faces like Jamie Gillis, Linda Lovelace, and especially Harry Reems, together in a non-pornographic parody of one of the most successful Adult films of all time. "Deep Throat Part II" possesses a kind of surreal quality, in the way that it looks like a * film, but it never goes there. While it's easy to see why people expecting and wanting to see a hardcore feature, would despise this thing, those looking for a straight up slapstick comedy filled with insider jokes and hysterically over the top performances from the Icons of Adult film, I don't understand how true fans of the 1970's hardcore movies wouldn't love this. Basically a spoof on the Russian spy genre, with Linda Lovelace being under investigation; they all want to know how Linda can make any man confess to anything. Reems plays a desperately horny psychiatrist, playing against type, a man who CAN'T get laid. His performance is hysterically corny and cute. It's also nice to see Linda in a film where she doesn't get physically debased, knowing how she secretly hated performing in adult films. This one is funny and sexy, without being explicit, and it is one of the true time capsules of an incredible decade that will never be topped. Also worthy of mention is it's truly excellent soundtrack, which adds to the delight of this oddball movie.

Very sad 2023-08-05

It boggled my mind to learn that the adult cult classic Deep Throat spawned five sequels. Right off the bat, the original film was unheard of and it's beyond clear that they just couldn't leave the idea alone. Deep Throat: Part II is, in short, miserable; a pointless exercise that even a devoted fan of the original could hate, as it trudges by in eighty-eight minutes, giving newfound respect to softcore films shown late on Cinemax that actually show something. I speak not as a person wanting to be pampered with intimate closeups of breasts and other body parts, but when a pornographic film feels so scared to show a simple breast on screen is where the line needs to be drawn. Deep Throat was, in short, a fun movie. It was funny when it needed to be, corny practically all the way through its runtime, and somewhat arousing, even as its scenarios and lines of dialog were blatantly asinine. Deep Throat: Part II is about as soulless as modern * and, frankly, feels more like making a regular film than a pornographic one. This is fine by me, any day, if the film (a) didn't borrow the name, actors, and strange humor from its predecessor and (b) didn't have such a lackluster, unfathomably uninteresting storyline. The film stars Linda Lovelace, once more, who, during Deep Throat, boldly exercised the rights of sexual freedom and women's choice. She plays herself again, working as a nurse for the sex doctor named Jayson (Harry Reems, who returns in a far less amusing role), with the goal